How You Know This Shit Was Written By Men!

[Thumpalumpacus]

Incorrect. Survival is the metric.


http://www.newsweek.com/2015/02/06/puber...01920.html

But that is not any expression of evolutionary motion. That is a physiological response to the environment, and its heritability hasn't been demonstrated. For this reason it gives your argument no support.

Ah, but your definition of evolution and mine are two separate things.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you believe that all life evolved from a common ancestor; I believe each species evolved from an ancestor of the same species, and of those two scenarios, only the latter is demonstrable.

Wrong, again. Look into the genetic coding for the human immunological system, for instance. Yes, this will require you to read a little, and (gasp!) read stuff you may not agree with at first. Also, I notice that this is just a fancy way of avoiding using the terms "mircoevolution" and "macroevolution". I'd be happy to see your hypothesis on what prevents the former from becoming the latter.

If we follow the narrative of the Bible, God originally created man, and in order for man to reproduce they had to inbreed. This was not a problem for them since they were the beginning of the species. Nowadays inbreeding with your sister is wrong and is highly likely to have negative effects.

So that being the case, we can ONLY go in a negative direction, heck according to scripture didn't man used to live upwards of 900 years?

So when I say we "devolved" know that I'm always referring to evolution from a biblical stand point, whether you agree with it or not...

There's your problem, then, I'm talking about facts; you're talking about horseshit. Not only did you get the mathematics of inbreeding wrong, you're basing it on a fanciful tale that has no bearing on the topic of evolution. Get back to me when you're ready and able to talk facts.

Until then, have a nice evening.