(January 20, 2017 at 11:26 am)JROHAN Wrote:Ignoring some bits...(January 20, 2017 at 11:09 am)pocaracas Wrote: You know?... that's not how rational thought works.
You don't start off with what things are not.
You go looking for what they are.
Gravity can "not be" many many many things. But it is only one thing.
If it is intelligently designed, science should eventually get there.
Until then, there is no reason to assume that it is.
Why do you believe that it is intelligently designed?
Because you can't understand the current physical understanding? Because it's not sufficient for your high standards?
Or because you are the one who's been brainwashed to find an intelligent designer in everything and look down on everyone else who is a tiny bit of intellectually honest with themselves and others around them?
You are too stupid to see that you place your faith in science
just as the blind faith religious place their faith in their religions
Can you imagine Why I put my faith in science?
Maybe it's because of historical track-record?
Maybe it's because it has provided me with a nice and comfy life?
(January 20, 2017 at 11:26 am)JROHAN Wrote: YOU WROTE:
If it is intelligently designed, science should eventually get there.
MY RESPONSE:
That's the type of statement the blind faith make
Can't you see that? Probably not
Again, you're not reading my words properly. "if" and "should" denote some uncertainty.
It is you who seem to be certain of the "intelligent design" notion. Why is that?
