(January 19, 2017 at 12:22 am)JROHAN Wrote: I was inspired to think this up as though the idea came to me from the very cosmos itself
What do you think?
I'm more than willing to change my opinion if any of you can wisely convince me how I am wrong:
It all comes down to taking a proverbial step back and challenging your brainwashing.
If there is no scientific evidence WHATSOEVER that gravity is the result of a
meaningless, random chance occurrence then
the assumption
IS BASED ON BLIND FAITH, NOT ON SCIENCE!!!
Ok, I'll bite.
Your argument is a variation on an old mistake and you have phrased it in a near incoherent way. It's a god of the gaps fallacy also called an argument from ignorance.
In your case, you seem to not comprehend that gravity is caused by mass so you are in fact questioning where mass comes from. i.e. where does the universe come from.
The typical god of the gaps argument goes like this: If you don't know where the universe comes from..then god did it. In your more incoherent version you state... if you don't know where the universe comes from... you are accepting that lack of knowledge on blind faith and not science.
Clearly you don't understand how meaningless it is to state that someone accepting the incompleteness of our scientific knowledge is somehow relying on faith. The two ideas simply don't go together so you took the fallacy of the argument from ignorance and made it even dumber.
Hope that answers your question.
If god was real he wouldn't need middle men to explain his wants or do his bidding.