(January 22, 2017 at 6:42 pm)Orochi Wrote: If there are no official Statistics then it's still lying to say you have the largest. It's no else's job to show it's false. It's there job to have those statists before making the claimI haven't excused anything. I admitted that it wasn't an offhand comment. You're delusional as usual.
Your excuses are getting boring
(January 22, 2017 at 6:53 pm)abaris Wrote:(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Now, is saying that is was the largest attending inugeration actually demonstrably incorrect at this point?
Look at the picture comparisons. They speak for themselves.
Obama 2009
![[Image: peak-trump-from-wash-mon.jpg]](https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2017/01/04/inauguration-crowds/9e038837b6bddf59b47212f9df94eff0cf6bbdee/peak-trump-from-wash-mon.jpg)
![[Image: peak_obama_from_wash-mon.jpg]](https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2017/01/04/inauguration-crowds/9e038837b6bddf59b47212f9df94eff0cf6bbdee/peak_obama_from_wash-mon.jpg)
I know there are these picture comparisons. However from what I understand trump and the gang are basically saying that simply showing comparing two pictures doesn't prove anything; That One picture could have captured the event when it wasn't at its largest and then been deliberately used for comparison to one that was
