RE: "The Arrival" (Spoiler Free(cause I haven't seen it))
February 6, 2017 at 4:41 pm
(This post was last modified: February 6, 2017 at 4:42 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
Amoral = morally neutral. Immoral= morally bad.
Therefore the amorality of noexistence is superior to the immorality of potential suffering
The lesson I take from this is at the end of the day.... we're only motivated by morality when it suits us. If antinatialism is the most moral thing then throw out morality because life is more important.
Ought implies can. And we can't live by antinatalism. Thereby in another sense it ISN'T moral. Because it's not realistic.
I guess it's only moral in theory. In practice it's not realistically moral.
Therefore the amorality of noexistence is superior to the immorality of potential suffering
The lesson I take from this is at the end of the day.... we're only motivated by morality when it suits us. If antinatialism is the most moral thing then throw out morality because life is more important.
Ought implies can. And we can't live by antinatalism. Thereby in another sense it ISN'T moral. Because it's not realistic.
I guess it's only moral in theory. In practice it's not realistically moral.
