(February 8, 2017 at 1:12 am)Godschild Wrote:(February 7, 2017 at 2:08 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Not natural. Not found in nature.
Sure about that?
So the proposition can be falsified by finding just one instance of homosexual activity in nature - discounting humans as natural for this.
Just one...
Even if some animals had homosexual tendencies that doesn't make it natural. The article you posted used human terms no animal could conceive the meaning of and words like may, might, possibly and could are not exactly purely positive statements, are they.
Like I said before the colon is designed as a one way street, it's specifically designed for evacuation not entry. This alone would make it unnatural.
GC
Women's breasts are meant to be suckled for milk.
Is it "natural" that you like to suck your wife's tits?
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
