(February 8, 2017 at 5:26 pm)Violet Wrote:
(February 8, 2017 at 5:05 pm)Jello Wrote: You're still not explaining why pink hair = bad, in the slightest, other than you have the opinion that they cannot be successful because of it, which is also unsubstantiated
Bad, if your understanding of bad is that it reduces the chances of a child succeeding in a professional setting. It is an opinion, it matters to me, and it would appear to be shared by many employers in this country (america, not where I am).
Good, if you're intending to see your child succeed in some artistic merit, perhaps. Doesn't pay as well on average though: market's oversaturated.
Ah, there's where part of the issue is; I'm in britain. We're not so pissy with stuff like this. Like i said, therapists and shit seem to have some real fun with their hair, and i'd deem them successful in a professional setting, although that may be biased as i wish to follow that path myself. (The becoming a therapist, not the dyed hair).
If you're curious why i keep going back to them as a point of reference as well, it's because it's the only one i have any evidence/experience with, i haven't looked much into hair dye in the professional world
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. For if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes unto you."
