RE: National Service
February 9, 2017 at 11:17 am
(This post was last modified: February 9, 2017 at 11:18 am by ukatheist.)
(February 9, 2017 at 11:09 am)Khemikal Wrote: @ukatheistMy mistake then, I was under the impression that you guys did most of that stuff 'in house'. But going back to the previous point, as, in most cases non-citizens aren't permitted to work for the civil service, the question of a non-citizen earning citizenship through it is a moot point. It's an interesting idea, but unlikely, we don't have a great track record on either refugees or being quick to give citizenship to people who really should get it (see Ghurkas).
That's not a difference. We award contracts to private business for our infrastructure programs. A national service could...depending on it's size, reduce or eliminate that necessity.
(February 9, 2017 at 11:09 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Remember to vote in the poll.Sorry, can't vote on Tapatalk (or give Kudos/rep for those who think I'm just a mean bitch).
(February 9, 2017 at 11:07 am)Alex K Wrote: Germany had this type of mandatory service for men until a few years ago. Either Military or social type work. It worked great, and the young "civil servants" were an important corner stone of social sevices and care for the elderly. I myself got a 3 month medical education and worked as a paramedic assistant/ambulance driver during my service.
Why did they get rid of it?
Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk