(March 2, 2017 at 7:17 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:I'm not pro-life or pro-choice. I support doing what is the most fair course of action in any scenario.(March 1, 2017 at 10:28 pm)pool the matey Wrote: Then you should stop with your "Hurr durr Wimminz bodiez u dnt gt 2 say anytin!!" kind of arguments, a baby is not the property of a mother, once it is conceived it is it's own person and deserves the right like every other human to grow up and make decisions by itself on whether it want to live or die or whatever.
Unless the fetus' father is a rapist? If a fetus is "its own person" somehow - then so is one, that's a result of a rape - that clump of cells is no different, than the "regular" pregnancy. Yet you are happy to deny those "babies" () the right to "grow up and make decisions by itself on whether it want to live or die or whatever". What did those fetuses do to you, or anybody? Can we also kill actual newborn babies, if they were fathered by rapists? No? Why not? According to you - they are no different from a few-weeks-old fetus.
It would be inhumane to force a woman to carry a child of her rapist, so I condemn it.
It would not be fair for a baby to be killed because of a "whoopsie", so I condone it.
There is no exact formula or exact course of action regardless of any circumstance, each circumstance is different and the action that is the most humane should be performed.
