(March 9, 2017 at 3:11 am)Godschild Wrote: No, the Bible states, what the movement represents is morally wrong.
Well, what the bible says is immaterial. I don't give a flying fox about any of its pronouncements on morality, especially when its track record in that area is on very dodgy ground.
(March 9, 2017 at 3:11 am)Godschild Wrote: As for the LGBT movement adopting the rainbow colors in a flag as their symbol... it was more likely not a statement against Christianity. I say this because the original had hot pink as the first color. The original flag was conceived during the "flower power" days when the rainbow was a popular symbol for other things as well.
All of which renders your numerology interpretation of it irrelevant and revealing.
(March 9, 2017 at 3:11 am)Godschild Wrote: My stand is against the OP's statement in this case not the LGBT movement, though you have known where I stand on that issue from long ago.
Correct but again irrelevant. What matters is not my opinion on your stance but nailing your trousers to the mast.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'