(March 13, 2017 at 1:03 am)Godschild Wrote: I take it that you are in support of the "big bang" as scientific fact. Yet there are secular scientist who have considerable doubt about this assumed fact.
Not really, no.
Even if there were, it wouldn't change anything. The Big Bang theory is evidence-based; even if it is eventually overturned (which is unlikely), in the present moment there is still enough support for it to make concluding that it is true a rational thing to do. Likewise for dark matter.
Belief in gods has no supporting evidence.
(March 13, 2017 at 1:03 am)Godschild Wrote: Call me crazy and or delusional because l believe in a God who has been argued over and attested to by the likes of Newton if that's what makes you happy.
Newton also believed in alchemy, among other insane nonsense. Mercury poisoning will do terrible things to a man.
In case you haven't realized it yet, the thing that determines which of Isaac Newton's theories we accept (gravity and so forth), as opposed to the ones that we discard (alchemy), is evidence, Godschild.
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
