(March 13, 2017 at 1:03 am)Godschild Wrote:(March 12, 2017 at 12:15 pm)Brian37 Wrote: ... Atlas, this is merely what I have seen from countless others from just about every religion you can think of in 16 years of online debate. When you have no positive proof with independent peer review, you resort to pretending philosophy can replace a neutral science lab.
....
Science explains nature and the universe, not religion.
All I am seeing in the OP is different words in attempt to avoid burden of proof.
I took out portions of your post to make this simpler, not to change what you had to say.
I take it that you are in support of the "big bang" as scientific fact. Yet there are secular scientist who have considerable doubt about this assumed fact.
It's a theory, not a fact. And the rest of your post shows how superficial you understanding of science is.
And how crazy and delusional you are.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
