Now and before.

[Nonpareil]

It is true, l've no reason to lie.

I did not say that you were lying.

You are simply wrong.

You say it's evidence based and immediately turn around and through doubt into your statement, that doesn't ring of confidence.

It's not doubt, Godschild. It's a simple observation. Even if the Big Bang theory is eventually shown to be incorrect, it is still evidence-based.

Belief in gods is not.

Newton is considered one of the most brilliant men to live, you and I are a long ways from thinking in his realm.

...which changes precisely nothing about the fact that we accept those things that he could support with evidence and reject those which he could not.

How can you have evidence of an unseen thing

If someone standing beside me is suddenly shot, I don't have to find the shooter to know that there is a gun involved.

if you apply your logic to dark matter you have to extend it to God.

No, Godschild. Dark matter has evidence supporting it. Gods do not.

I have never claimed l can give an atheist the evidence he/she requires to prove God, the Bible tells us about evidence {which l accept) but non-believers refuse to accept.

Because the Bible is not evidence. Point blank, period. There is and can be no arguing on this point.

If you believe the claims contained within the Bible, then that is fine. But the Bible is not evidence. It does not contain any information which logically supports the conclusion of "a god exists", any more than The Last Unicorn proves the existence of King Haggard. At best, its stories are unverified; more commonly, they are demonstrably fiction. In neither case is it evidence.

You are free to believe whatever you like. If adopting an irrational belief makes you happy, then more power to you.

But when you start claiming to have actual evidence, you're going to have to start presenting some.