(April 3, 2017 at 9:22 pm)vorlon13 Wrote:(April 3, 2017 at 8:12 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Maybe. Maybe not.
The evidence for "paul" is as shaky as the evidence for jesus.
Boils down to somebody retconned, rewrote and revised somebody else. Attributing the heretical displacement of the 'Biblical Jesus' message to the hands of 'Biblical Paul' is rather more devastating to the advocates of Biblical truth than attribution to a 'flock' of anonymous scribes, no ??
[snicker]
Indeed. And it is not even well done.
2 Corinthians for example seems to be a pastiche of several letters rolled up into one. Now. Who would do such a thing?
