(April 5, 2017 at 5:50 pm)Thena323 Wrote: IF, this personal account is actually true, it's not all that surprising to me. Any douchebag who would be that vested in changing his or her spouse's personal beliefs to begin with, is probably quite the smarmy asshole. Stands to reason that such pompous fuckwads would think their life stories should be cinematic events.
Yes...folks will lap it up. What do you want?
People want something to believe in. They wish to be inspired. To have their pet beliefs, validated/reinforced.
And, they're dumb.
If you think posting some Tweets can change that, though, go for it.
It is not about tweets, it is about being everywhere. Look what asshole Trump has done. Surely if that dipshit can get big on ALL media selling his crap, surely skeptics can sell facts doing the same thing.
Yes, twitter and Facebook and Snapchat and Instagram, YES skeptics should be involved too. Times change and media changes and we cant expect theist to conform to a library all the time. Theism adapts through the same changing media any other product adapts. Soda and cars and music also win or lose with changing times. I don't see why we cant market FACTS with the same tools theists use to sell superstition. It seems facts win in the venue of an open society. Secrecy is what theism and superstition relies on. The biggest fear of theism is someone who has more information by the time they try to peddle it.
I am not expecting anyone to to convert a person on the spot in one communication. I am expecting skeptics to be as involved with the global community and all the medias involved. Theism loses over time as media expands our species seems to become more progressive. We cant sit out we should not sit out.
