(April 9, 2017 at 9:43 pm)AceBoogie Wrote:(April 9, 2017 at 9:40 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Please QUOTE me IN EXACT WORDS where I accused you of selling me anything.
I SAID your are using a word rooted in a past older than your own personal interpretation.
You are arguing an new version of an old word. In the same way Buddhists don't want to admit their own past. Just like there are Jews who skip the God but like the ritual. Just like Bill O'Reilly has argued Catholicism to be a "philosophy" and not a religion.
Satanism is a word to describe others who buy into the same ideas you do. It still has "Satan" rooted in the word itself. Just like Jews hate it when you point out the word "Yahweh" started out as a polytheistic CLAIM.
YES I am sure you want to call it a "philosophy" but again, doesn't change that someone in the past took the word "Satan" from the old traditions and decided to market it as "philosophy".
LMFAO. ^^
Proof that not all atheists are intelligent.
edit:
You are literally just repeating the same things several times after I've explained that I'm not disagreeing with you on some of your points. You are one moronic individual.
So the word "Satan" is new?
So the word "Satan" isn't used by Muslims or Christians ever. They never had a concept of God vs Satan.
Magically the letter sequence "Satan" became a new and correct usage when you started adding "ism" to it? The Suffix never existed prior to your personal interpretation?
Yep and Buddha was not born of the Queen Maya, and he didn't avoid the birth canal because that is now just a "philosophy" too.