From Richard Carrier's summation on the "gospel of mark" in On The Historicity of Jesus.
And of course the other 3 are just redactions of "mark" so if mark is shit they are re-vised shit.
Quote:Obviously I can continue with example after example, exhausting every
scene in Mark, proving it either is more likely fiction than history. or as
likely as not. There is no good case to be made that any scene in Mark
reflects a historical Jesus. Because most scenes clearly do not, and even if
any do, we cannot discern which, or what in them is historical.
pg 456
And of course the other 3 are just redactions of "mark" so if mark is shit they are re-vised shit.