(April 23, 2017 at 3:57 pm)Thena323 Wrote:(April 23, 2017 at 12:59 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I have a lot of evidence. A lot that I have not shown. But let me know when you are interested.
Yeah, I'm interested in evidence...Now, quit offering more WORDS, and show me some goddamned MAGIC!
Right now! Let's see it!
Quote:Every thread that I begin to talk about a bit of these proofs, people, spiral out of control to demanding proof for God in the first place.
"Out of control"??? For demanding proof, before wholeheartedly accepting your version Magic, Invisible Overseer? Hell, I suppose you're right. 'Cause let's face it; your incessant whining, shitty poetry, and mere insistence should be enough any 'reasonable' person, right?
Sorry for being so 'difficult'...heh heh.
@Mystic
How is this thread "out of control"? Of course we are demanding evidence, but not just from you. Catholic Lady has been in here too posting, and even emjay while not a Buddhist is also trying to claim science matches some of Buddhism's teaching. There is NOTHING personal going on here to you, or anyone.
It is why I started this thread for EVERYONE, and nobody has been able so far to make an argument that proves they are being neutral, you haven't CL has not and Emjay has not.
That is why all of you need to ASK YOURSELVES, why you feel the need to hold your respective positions. Not what you believe or why you believe, but why you feel the need to hold your positions.
The point is to get everyone of ANY label to consider that they do have a bias and are not being neutral.
Catholic Lady thinks she is being objective and neutral.
Emjay thinks she is also being objective and neutral.
I am sure if we had a Jew in this thread they would claim the same.
I am sure if we had a Hindu in this thread they would claim the same.
All of you will accept some science up and until it points away from your personal bias's.
THAT is why I ask, "Why do you feel the need to hold your position". It cannot be considered neutral or objective if you have already pointed in one direction over all others.
If something is neutral, it doesn't point to anything, it is peer reviewed independently and can be replicated outside one's own personal bias.
