Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 2, 2025, 1:44 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Missing Link and the Irreducible Complexity of the Eye
#5
RE: The Missing Link and the Irreducible Complexity of the Eye
(May 6, 2017 at 12:44 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: Although Darwin expressed perplexity over the eye, scientists have since fully documented the evolution of the eye.

Actually, he didn't. What he was doing with his famous "absurd in the highest possible degree" passage was pointing out that such things seem counter-intuitive on the surface. He goes on to say:

"When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science. Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself originated; but I may remark that, as some of the lowest organisms, in which nerves cannot be detected, are capable of perceiving light, it does not seem impossible that certain sensitive elements in their sarcode should become aggregated and developed into nerves, endowed with this special sensibility."

Don't fall down the creatards' quotemine.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Missing Link and the Irreducible Complexity of the Eye - by Cyberman - May 6, 2017 at 1:43 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Link between brain damage and religious fundamentalism established Fake Messiah 9 1945 November 18, 2019 at 12:14 am
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy
  Missing Link to A Missing Link! Minimalist 9 1390 October 28, 2018 at 7:25 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Tips on how to boost eye health purplepurpose 24 4213 March 3, 2018 at 8:52 pm
Last Post: AFTT47
  The "Complexity of the Eye", for stupid creationists. Gawdzilla Sama 10 2692 December 8, 2017 at 3:41 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Single celled creature with functioning eye. downbeatplumb 19 7492 December 14, 2015 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Bionic eye implant world first zebo-the-fat 12 4613 July 22, 2015 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: QuarkDriven
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 16205 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Eye the Size of a Softball thesummerqueen 22 7155 October 15, 2012 at 11:36 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Light-powered bionic eye invented to help restore sight zebo-the-fat 7 4600 June 13, 2012 at 5:37 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Ten Sticks in the Eye for Creationist Morons in 2011 Minimalist 5 3659 January 1, 2012 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)