RE: The Missing Link and the Irreducible Complexity of the Eye
May 6, 2017 at 6:27 pm
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2017 at 6:28 pm by GrandizerII.)
(May 6, 2017 at 5:54 pm)Cyberman Wrote: About fifteen years ago, before I got involved with this stuff, there was a letter in a local free newspaper about the impossibility of the human eye evolving. I had never heard of Richard Dawkins at this point, nor any of the major players we now take for granted. Even then, I managed to work out in my head the sort of evolutionary sequence that might have occurred, from light-sensitive cells to fully-formed eyes.
It's like when there's a will, there's a way. In this case, the intellectual will to work it out and see if it really is impossible or not.
The sin of the creationist is that they don't attempt to solve the problem in their heads. They're already satisfied with their position.
