(May 7, 2017 at 4:56 pm)alpha male Wrote:(May 6, 2017 at 1:36 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: even a poorly performing eye organ is better (from a survival aspect) than not having one at all
Not necessarily. People always talk about a photosensitive cell. By itself, it's no better than nothing at all.
I'd suggest you look up "scaffolding". No mutation exists in a vacuum. Their environment is not only the outer world, but the genetic environment the mutations arise in. A light-sensitive cell arises in a brainless animal? You might have a point. It arises in an animal which has a brain? The possibility of processing exists. If it can and does, then you've got a whole 'nother ball of wax.
More creationist binary thinking on display here.
