RE: The Missing Link and the Irreducible Complexity of the Eye
May 9, 2017 at 2:46 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2017 at 3:25 pm by Rhondazvous.)
(May 9, 2017 at 7:46 am)Khemikal Wrote: If I were a cretinist, I don't think I'd wonder much about the plausibility(?) of photoresponses evolutionary development.....I'd wonder more at the fact that photoresponse was literally baked in at a point well -before- biological evolution. The very first moment that the very first life arose, at least one of the means by which photoresponse is and was achieved already existed. Photoresponse predates cells.....
That is so true. The potential for photoresponse goes at least as far back as the great oxygenation event. Consider how plants respond to the sun, following its course across the sky. Then consider the possible evolutionary connection between plants and animals at the time of the oxygenation event. It's all there.
(May 9, 2017 at 10:14 am)Cyberman Wrote: That's just a regular Big Mac.This is why it's always so dark in McDees, to keep the hamburgers from evolving into something that stares back at us.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
