(May 12, 2017 at 1:39 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(May 12, 2017 at 1:35 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: It's still an example of the equivocation fallacy.
It was obvious that a figurative poetic definition of "heart" was being used and he equivocated it to a literal biological definition of the word "heart".
Well yeah that's what I mean, I think it was an intentional jab, not really a genuine error. Still not great.
I mean that it's fallacious if taken as an argument.