Yeah, you believe what's most comfortable for you to believe.
1. Maybe, like a lot of other legendary figures. Doesn't make him (or any of them) divine. That doesn't even follow.
2. That's exactly what's in question, good question begging.
3. And apparently so does Buddha and Krishna. That's possibly evidence that meditating on an inspirational figure can be psychologically useful, not that the figure being meditated on is real.
4. You think God is the best explanation, but 'God did it' isn't actually an explanation at all, it's a way to pretend you've got one when you actually don't know.
Lot's of bad reasons do not add up to one good one.
1. Maybe, like a lot of other legendary figures. Doesn't make him (or any of them) divine. That doesn't even follow.
2. That's exactly what's in question, good question begging.
3. And apparently so does Buddha and Krishna. That's possibly evidence that meditating on an inspirational figure can be psychologically useful, not that the figure being meditated on is real.
4. You think God is the best explanation, but 'God did it' isn't actually an explanation at all, it's a way to pretend you've got one when you actually don't know.
Lot's of bad reasons do not add up to one good one.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
