RE: 19 dead, 50 injured, after terror attack
May 24, 2017 at 5:06 pm
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2017 at 5:07 pm by CapnAwesome.)
(May 24, 2017 at 3:02 am)AtlasS33 Wrote:Yeah, the middle east was just a bunch of roses and hand holding before America got involved.(May 23, 2017 at 4:33 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Child abuse is most rampant in schools, and mostly done by teachers than any other vocation. Priests don't molest kids any more than the average man, so I don't know why they carry the stereotype.
I'm not saying this to excuse their behavior or to say it is any less horrific (I'm sorry that it happens. I apologize on their behalf). But what I am saying is that I often see it talked about like it's something unique to Catholic churches and that it happens there more than any where else where adults deal closely with children. It doesn't at all.
But that's beside the point. I don't understand why we *always* need to bring up wrongdoings of Catholic clergy or other Christians or people from 1000 year ago or even Americans in threads about a radical Islamic terrorist attack. It happens every time and I don't understand why. A radical Islamist blows people up and immediately people here start: "Well the Crusades this and that," "Catholic priests this and that," "Christians this and that," "Americans this and that." I mean, come on already. Why use horrible tragedies to make a point about another group of people when those people had nothing to do with it? Why not just acknowledge and discuss the evil at hand that just happened rather than creating diversions?
There are plenty of threads about Catholicism and Catholic priests here made entirely for the purpose to talking about how horrible they/we/our beliefs are. I don't understand why every thread about some Radical Islamic mother fucker blowing people up has to become about Catholic priests.
America supported terrorists to win the war against the soviet union.
That's why the fact is always brought up: America armed Jihadists and gave them training and weapons. Gave them the boost they needed in terms of training and arming.
Whenever a bomb is blown by a radical Muslim; it's not only the terrorist's fault; but it's also the fault of the U.S for training his militia to use bombing back in the cold war.
Also, radical Islam blossomed in Saudi Arabia. America and Saudi Arabia are allies.
Allow me to put it this way: America is friends with the factory of radical Islam since 1933.
Whenever a bomb explodes; think about the messed up foreign policy of the U.S
It's a fact: going to war with America means that Sunni and Shiite militias would invade with the U.S, slapping the existence out of the place with both airstrikes and suicide bombing. Look at Iraq.
It's always related. The facts enforce themselves on whoever knows a piece of history.
Just like Islam is used in American wars, Christianity is also used.
It's all related; CL.
And whenever a war breaks; millions of tiny little poor souls become psychopaths, rightist Europeans attacking mosques and infest the society with racism against immigrants, and crazy Muslims who eat eyeballs for dinner and blow up themselves for fun .
That's the big picture. It always begins with a twisted priest or a lying Sheikh, that got their propaganda fuel from the acts of a selfish piece of shit like Bush or Trump.
ISIS use the misery Muslims saw in Iraq to preach their propaganda. Mosques in Saudi Arabia produce terrorists by using the pain of Syrians.
Everything is related.
(May 24, 2017 at 5:05 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:People say that same nonsense in this forum after every attack. It's never true. One, it's not their MO to suicide bomb, so don't be stupid.
It's not stupid it's totally possible . Hell it's already happened . And as I already explained in the very comment stealing other groups tactics is a terrorists MO . Isis and Al-Qaida stole there idea's from previous groups . So why not?
Because it's never true. When has anybody other than a Muslim done a suicide bombing in Europe?