RE: Why Do Atheists Criticize People's Beliefs?
May 26, 2017 at 12:11 pm
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2017 at 12:15 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(May 26, 2017 at 11:55 am)Crossless1 Wrote:(May 26, 2017 at 11:04 am)Huggy74 Wrote: There is no confusion, defining it by using lower case makes it no less irrelevant.
Ofcourse, that's the very definition of a liar.
If I recount Harry Potter differntly than what's originally written down, would I not be a liar?
If I delivered a doctrine and then said that anyone who fundamentally disagrees with my doctrine is accursed, would you just take my word for it or would you think that perhaps I was making a power play?
Paul's doctrine does not contradict the Scriptures, in fact it lines up perfectly with the rest of the bible.
Any doctrine that Matches up with the scriptures must be accepted as true.
Therefore if Paul's doctrine is sound, any contradicting doctrine makes that doctrine false.
(May 26, 2017 at 11:32 am)Cyberman Wrote:(May 26, 2017 at 11:04 am)Huggy74 Wrote: If I recount Harry Potter differntly than what's originally written down, would I not be a liar?
Or adapting it for some reason.
Okay...
The point is it is no longer canon.