I am an atheist that despises atheists

[Mister Agenda]

I'm an atheist, who despises morons, like you, who don't understand evolution. There's nothing in evolution theory, that opposed gay rights, for example. Most mammal species display a certain amount of homosexual  behaviors and it's not a problem. In fact, it can often be beneficial. Only simpletons and macho-posturing c*nts see evolution as a race to procreate. There are countles examples of animal species, where a large proportion of specimens are unable, or "unwilling" to procreate, yet their "societies" survive and are bettet for it - like social insects, or pack mammals.

Get a f*cking education, dimwit, and stop using pseudo-science to rationalize your bigotry, inherited from your goat-f*cking ancestors... And then suck a d*ck.

I despise atheist like you for showing anger at something non existent.

Pretty sure you're existent.

I only said a mere snippet of my beliefs so they would not be taken as something wholly important. Also you are talking to a guy with enough scholarships to make your head spin, if the current education is this lacking in its ability to teach critical thinking and mandate wider philosophical practices then I am very worried. 

. . . I would just assume that you are uneducated though.

Funny, you haven't demonstrated any critical thinking. Here's a tip for forum communication: don't brag about your education, demonstrate it in the quality of your posts.

As for my statement about homosexuality. It is not productive evolutionary nor is a union of homosexual pairs a norm, especially in primates. You do not see any animal on earth using hierarchy to legitimize mating or sexual pairs yet so many atheist think a National Daddy needs to give them permission. That is all I am stating and that alone gives you enough fire to make an idiot out of yourself. 

In all your education they never covered the naturalistic fallacy? It does not follow that because something isn't conducive to reproductive success, that no one should do it and no one should be allowed to do it. It does not follow that we should not use the apparatus of government to protect minorities because they aren't following the same traditions as the majority.

Please fuck off you ignorant sack of shit.

That's fair.

---

Yeah.... but should you be thrown off a building by towel-wearing barbarians because of it?


http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/7526...th-penalty

You are talking to a former Hanafi Muslim so I am familiar with how Islam handles homosexuality in accordance to the kutab al-Sittah and I obviously do not agree with it nor do I care with what people do in their bedroom at all unless it involves a girl who looks like an anime loli. <--- humor

But why is this relevant? I am only curious about the variety in atheism. Even in my college life I have experienced some variety in atheism yet every single atheist I encountered was completely despicable or just intellectually dishonest. The only reasonable 'atheists' I ever metal were apatheistic towards religion although clearly expressed no belief in a deity. So this only leaves me puzzled as I have been an atheist for years. Even by the time I left Islam I was already in norm with many opinions held by atheist. I was officially booted out of Muslim groups for showing "love towards kufur."

Don't get me started on Muslims and their obsession with getting rid of love and their lengthy rants on how it is sinful to show kindness to others. You would be begging to socialize with a fundie Christian in a matter of minutes. 

Funny how that works when you equate 'reasonable' with 'agrees with me'. Then hardly anyone but you is reasonable, but people who think that way are a dime a dozen.