(June 28, 2017 at 6:54 pm)ManofYesterday Wrote:(June 28, 2017 at 6:37 pm)Alex K Wrote: That should read "the brain is *claimed* to be the product of..."
That is not a good reason automatically, it merely would be a good reason if the premise were true, which is begging the question. Nothing can be concluded from this statement about Christianity.
That's the point I was making, obviously. I was comparing two world views. First I followed where atheism leads and then I followed where Christianity leads. I also explained how it would be difficult for the atheist to reconcile their belief that the brain can be trusted to produce true beliefs with their belief that their brain is the product of merely cold and mindless natural processes. Christianity doesn't have this same difficulty.
That being said, if this is all you have in response to my previous post (a strawman/misunderstanding), then I must have done an amazing job.
Is there anything else that you'd like to add?
(June 28, 2017 at 6:41 pm)Alex K Wrote: When theistogians want to refute atheism, it's always COLD, MINDLESS evolution they argue about. Always cold and mindless. You can see them struggling with what they know the evidence leads to, but which they cannot accept on an emotional level.
Wait, so you don't think your brain is the product of cold and mindless evolution?
(June 28, 2017 at 6:51 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: god is all good, pa-lease. Read much? If the product of god they should be pretty good at killin and rapin also.
Yeah, I read a lot. Do you read at all?
May I say, and I'm just being completely honest here ..
.. you sound just like some really angry believer who just can't believe anyone would deliberately turn away from God. Welcome anyway, no hard feelings? Can't say that I'll pray for you but at least I'll stop preying on you now. How's that?
