RE: If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new
June 28, 2017 at 7:23 pm
(June 28, 2017 at 4:53 pm)SteveII Wrote:(June 27, 2017 at 10:35 pm)Astonished Wrote: Your ignorance of the actual facts of your mythology notwithstanding, this ideal you have of a god who possesses omniscience, omnipotence and omnibenevolence not only does not hold up against the problem of evil, but even the omniscient and omnipotent ones break down individually on their own. Anyone looking at all the data objectively would conclude that not only does the entire enterprise not exist and that death ends up the same state of non-being we experienced prior to birth, but even if it did exist, those who earn the 'reward' would hardly be better off at the foot of this monstrous demon god than those in the lake of fire.
What specifically is the problem with omniscience and omnipotence?
Tell me about the Problem of Evil and why that makes a difference?
The contradiction of the inability to change one's own mind if one knows with certainty what one will do in the future, the making a rock so big it can't be lifted, what, you haven't heard those? And the problem of evil is only a 'problem' if you're like the lying happy-ass hippy dippy stain who posted before you and thinks there's something positive about that horrific monster to look forward to. Those who understand things objectively don't have any illusions that there's any good there to have to defend. It's why we get that even if it's true, that's literally the worst possible outcome for everyone. You might as well worship the Old Ones.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.