Am I right to assume, that theists cannot prove that I am not god?

[Godscreated]

I've already proven you wrong, but here's another, we'll wait to you die.

GC

---

 Funny all the other atheist say they do not believe in any god.

GC

Jesus supposedly died and then descended to heaven, though the accounts of who the witnesses were, etc., are contradictory.

So the death of someone is not necessarily proof, using that logic, that the person is not a deity.  Perhaps their current form is merely an avatar for a deity, one that will be shed at the death of the current body.

 Descended, really. As for the rest of your statement it is not logical.

GC

---

---

There was bread to eat and wine to drink and neither of these in themselves are sinful and I'm not sure where you got the idea they were. The scriptures call for people not to be drunkards and people were raising and using wheat centuries before Jesus was born. Jesus used the wine to represent His blood and the unleavened bread to represent His flesh. This was used as a symbol of the crucifixion he was to suffer for all of man kind.


Christians are smarter than you are. We realize Jesus drank wine and so did the disciples and Jesus did not eat flesh nor did His disciples. No sin committed. Transubstantiation is the act of substitution, Jesus was/is our substitute for our punishment for sin, just as the wine and bread are substitutes for the blood and flesh, the Catholics have gotten this wrong as many other things.


What some may have called Him and who He was/is are two different things. You need to site His prophecies that didn't come to pass.


First of all these are not your original thoughts as you are portraying. Second Jesus being God couldn't have taken His name in vain. Third we Christians are smarter than you because we understand what a substitute is. also the Father would not have allowed Jesus to go to the cross if He had sinned and even if He had He would not have raised Him from the dead, because the payment for sin is death. Jesus crucifixion is proof He went to the cross sinless. 
 

Exodus 12:8 the LORD says," They shall eat the flesh (of the lamb) that night, roasted on the fire; with unleavened bread and bitter herbs they shall eat it." You really should study the scriptures own your own, copying others work that is wrong makes you look foolish, dumb even. If you're going to make yourself look foolish you should at least try to get it right. Allowing some one else to do the incorrect work and copying it, well what else can I say. For you leavened bread would be what you should have said. All Jews knew that unleavened bread was to be eaten at the Passover and that was probably all that was available on that day. No use in making a bread that you can't sale, is there. 
  

That doesn't translate over into the English language and we as Christians know what He was eating as I stated above. So unless you're reading a Hebrew translation of the NT you're barking up the wrong tree and making yourself look the more foolish all the time.


Misinterpretation on your part doesn't even begin to state the illogical notions you are stating. You say the Christians knew the difference but then you accuse Jesus of not knowing the Jewish law that he knew well and like I said there more than likely wouldn't have been any leaven bread available that day. Jesus disciples were the ones who prepared the meal, so you have to make a argument hoe thirteen Jewish men could have missed something that was habit for them. You are sounding more ridiculous by the minute.


You're the one done well done. You said Christians knew that Jesus was to serve unleavened bread, because the Bible teaches us that, Then you say that because the writers were not Jewish those Christians did not know the difference. So how did it get into the Bible. Prove the writers of the NT were not Jewish, that will be a tall order without the original manuscripts. It's funny you would say they did not know Jewish law when aspects of the Jewish laws are all over the NT.


Jesus himself said He did not come to change the Law but to fulfill it, do you even know what that means. Jesus came to be the finial sacrifice for all of mankind not just the Jews. Jesus also being part of the truine God gave those laws to Moses and the Israelites. Jesus never changed the law and the Israelites gave up the sacrifice of animal on their own. When the temple fell by the hands of the Romans the Jews scattered and basically dump what they had practiced for centuries. 


 Arbitrarily glance, yeah right. Also didn't you tell me that the Torah wasn't a main concern of the Jews. Jesus never sinned and all you stated is fabricated nonsense because you haven't the slightest ability to rationalize or logically understand the Bible and especially the translation into English. Vast Vision is as guilty of sin as I am, the problem for Vast Vision, no forgiveness yet. You do you have forgiveness of your sin, do you sacrifice offerings to God, do you thank God through the first fruit offerings. You need to look at what your standing is with God before criticizing others.

GC

---

Oooooh, you sound needlessly agressive in your response. Did I strike a chord with you? So sorry, sweetie pie. I'll try to play more nicely with you in the future.

 Play however you want everyone else does some very nice others nice and most not so nice. Aggressive surely not, well maybe but why not.

GC