RE: Am I right to assume, that theists cannot prove that I am not god?
July 17, 2017 at 11:14 am
(This post was last modified: July 17, 2017 at 11:16 am by Inkfeather132.
Edit Reason: The post was too large with the quote left in
)
Good for you for wanting to improve. All I was saying is that it is hard to understand you, and that that means it's hard to have a meaningful discussion.
You give several "what if" statements, but do you have evidence to back any of them up? You say god exists apart from religion. I say, I don't care you still have to provide the evidence.
Dead involves more than the heart stopping, the brain has to stop as well. Can you provide the medical records of all the people on that website so I can see what doctors said about them? Or are they just claiming things with no evidence to back it up, as usual? As for why would god revive someone who's head has been cut off, that would be a true miracle with no other explanation than that something supernatural occured. So why doesn't he give us that evidence?
Roman historians say he was real (and that's debatable by the way), they don't say he was resurrected. We all know the Titanic was real, but that doesn't mean that the events in the movie Titanic actually happened.
Again, you're going to have to back up what you're saying with evidence, not a website full of claims that could easily be made up.
Also, appealing to the authority of doctors is fallacious. Doctors are humans and absolutely can declare someone dead wrongfully.
You give several "what if" statements, but do you have evidence to back any of them up? You say god exists apart from religion. I say, I don't care you still have to provide the evidence.
Dead involves more than the heart stopping, the brain has to stop as well. Can you provide the medical records of all the people on that website so I can see what doctors said about them? Or are they just claiming things with no evidence to back it up, as usual? As for why would god revive someone who's head has been cut off, that would be a true miracle with no other explanation than that something supernatural occured. So why doesn't he give us that evidence?
Roman historians say he was real (and that's debatable by the way), they don't say he was resurrected. We all know the Titanic was real, but that doesn't mean that the events in the movie Titanic actually happened.
Again, you're going to have to back up what you're saying with evidence, not a website full of claims that could easily be made up.
Also, appealing to the authority of doctors is fallacious. Doctors are humans and absolutely can declare someone dead wrongfully.
Being careful is for people who can't handle surprises.
