(July 27, 2017 at 6:40 am)ignoramus Wrote: OK.
#theist hat on (because I'm bored)
So we know that nature "seems" to defy logic and reason and "seems" to act in a spooky "supernatural" way. IE: double slit.
Are we as science "indoctrinated" people completely oblivious to other preposterous explanations such as godly intervention?
It sounds wrong, but we are also the first to state we don't know most things. Why are respectable science people comfortable entertaining hypotheses of an equally absurd explanation?
Sure, I think all woo is bs, but logically and only because it can't be proven to be true, no matter how absurd. No different to the double slit spooky stuff.
Scientists are more than happy to come up with their own woo and basically call it a proper hypothesis?
Why can't something like a god (not as described by the babble of course) be a missing factor to be entertained?
It would be a waste of a perfectly supernatural God if its job were "ok, I'll look at all the particle interactions in the Universe and I'll always interfere such that everything looks exactly as if it were always governed by a simple Schrödinger's equation. That'll completely confuse them."
I would expect God to delegate that menial task to some poor angel he doesn't like.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
