(August 8, 2017 at 5:20 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:Not just that but the seller claimed it was haunted but did not disclose to the buyer. The case nor the laws actually deal with if a ghost is actually present or not.(August 8, 2017 at 2:54 pm)ohreally Wrote: BS, there is no law in real estate about ghosts.
This is not necessarily true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigmatized_property
Stambovsky v. Ackley - the property did not in fact have to *be* haunted, the seller just had to believe it was.
The OP is probably full of shit, however.
If ghosts were real they would be listed in the material disclosure portion because they would be detectable in an inspection.
If water rots the soles of your boots, what does it do to your intestines?
