RE: Better terminology for "Father and Son" ?
August 9, 2017 at 7:54 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2017 at 8:05 pm by Godscreated.)
(August 9, 2017 at 7:36 am)Harry Nevis Wrote:(August 9, 2017 at 1:34 am)Godscreated Wrote: I'm explaining God as the Bible does, it's not my fault you can't grasp this.
GC
We grasp it. We just don't have the emotional need to swallow the crap like you do.
No you do not grasp it or you would be a Christian, you haven't the fortitude to seek Jesus.
GC
(August 9, 2017 at 11:29 am)vorlon13 Wrote: I'm reminded of something attributed to Abraham Lincoln:
If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a sheep have??
4
Calling a tail a leg does not make it a leg.
So, circling back to the topic, calling the relationship between God and Jesus "father and son" doesn't make it "father and son", and believing it to be is not consistent with any possibility of Salvation.
They call each other Father and Son and we have no reason to believe differently and yes believing it has everything to do with salvation, an atheist trying to teach the Bible to Christians, now that is a joke.
vorlon13 Wrote:Is there a Melvin (age 83) and Bruce Wiltfang (age 58) of Rascal Corners, Ohio*, who share the same relationship between themselves that Jesus and God share?? How about somewhere in India?? South America???
Of coarse our relationship is different and I do not believe anyone has said differently. They are God which we will never be and in that alone we differ in relationships.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.