Q: How do you know X happened?
A: Because B said so.
Q: How do you know B is giving reliable testimony?
A: Because C said so.
Q: How do you know C is giving reliable testimony about B?
A: Because D said so.
Q: How do you know D is giving reliable testimony about C?
A: Because E said so.
If you don't see that this renders testimony utterly moot, you don't belong in this world.
A: Because B said so.
Q: How do you know B is giving reliable testimony?
A: Because C said so.
Q: How do you know C is giving reliable testimony about B?
A: Because D said so.
Q: How do you know D is giving reliable testimony about C?
A: Because E said so.
If you don't see that this renders testimony utterly moot, you don't belong in this world.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
