RE: North Korea launches ballistic missile across northern Japan, falls into sea
August 30, 2017 at 6:59 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2017 at 7:02 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(August 29, 2017 at 8:42 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(August 29, 2017 at 7:46 pm)Hammy Wrote: Yes apart from the fact that:
He has a point here.
So my next question would be "Would the worst possible botching be worse than what I'd suffer in a nuclear war?"
Yes. In a nuclear war you might be painlessly incinerated in a millisecond. People who tried to blow their own brains out have missed and ended up with a deep, ghastly open trench across where their eye balls and sinuses use to be for life.
Couldn't a similar thing happen if I'm BARELY in cover in a nuclear war? So the blast is so strong it gets through the bunker but the bunker protects me enough that rather than getting incinerated in a millisecond I get severely injured to fuck, paralyzed and die a slow agonizing death?
Hmm. So it looks like the best option is to stay out into the open so I can feel the full force of blast and die instantly
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92868/92868735cdaa5f3c6a32c0fa84134c16065ead08" alt="Tongue Tongue"
In all seriousness, I'm not convinced by the whole "quick death is better" thing. A more painful death in a millisecond is far worse than a slow death, IMO.
(August 29, 2017 at 10:09 pm)Fireball Wrote:(August 29, 2017 at 8:14 pm)Hammy Wrote: Huh? I don't get it. Is that something nitrogen gas would happen in a nuclear war?
Nope. If you are concerned about suffering a lingering death from radiation poisoning, and want to end your life quickly and painlessly, the nitrogen exit method is the real deal. If you manage to get fried in a nuclear fireball (that's my big brother, lol), you will never know what hit you.
See above. I think instant deaths are often more painful.