(September 4, 2017 at 8:14 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(September 4, 2017 at 8:01 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: No.
We just don't take words from a discredited book written on behalf of an illiterate child molester to be anything more than what it is: a control mechanism over the weak minded.
You want to discredit the book of God on the basis of your desires from something itself forbids (it forbids marrying children and even says the age of marriage is that of the most prime time of a human, when they are their greatest strength and when they are sufficient intelligence to be guided in life) and from something narrated by the very people it tells us to not trust and not to take their words for granted.
You want to deny what is for certain and has clear proofs by what doesn't but is just noise from those who wish to put out God's light.
You can't discredit "the book from god" before it is legitimately credited to it.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam