Who Says

[Godscreated]

 I see the only reason atheist jump on my spelling is because it's the only argument they have against what I've said. I hardly ever see atheist correcting each others spelling and everyone here knows that is true. I've seen atheist here misspelling words all the time and I say nothing about it, why, because I make the effort to figure out what was intended and usually can. I do not see that it's important to call out people for misspelling words or using the wrong word such as I did with the word meat instead of meet. Really if I can figure out what others are saying despite their misspelled words those who claim their superior spelling ability should easily be able, too. Like I said to begin with I see people who point out others misspellings and offer no other argument to a post are without an argument. I don't mind being corrected it helps me to improve and I have, what I mind is the superior attitude that's used in such correction. I know my own weaknesses it's why I try and look up any word I have doubt about spelling it.

GC

That doesn't answer my question. If I don't point out your spelling errors, are you going to point out that I didn't point out your spelling errors, like you did in the post that prompted my question? Yes or no would cover it.

I'm not sure what post you are speaking of.

GC

---

 You nor anyone else has ever defeated anything presented from scripture. Those newly hatched atheist you are speaking of mostly use bad language and senseless talk to make an impression on the older atheist here, and you guys fall for it and defend such drivel. Shame on you for lowering yourself to such a level.

GC

Defeated anything from scripture? I could say that you haven't defeated anything from Lord of the Rings. Both are works of fiction. Yet you are making an assumption that we do not, that scripture isn't fiction. There is no reason to believe that scripture is anything other than made up nonsense, and plenty of reason to believe that it is.

You know your own particular brand of fiction like a true fan boy and can only make strawman arguments against evidence based science because you don't understand what you are arguing against.

All that's false, period.

GC