(September 14, 2017 at 1:47 pm)Succubus Wrote:(September 14, 2017 at 10:08 am)Little Rik Wrote: Good luck?![]()
There is no need for any luck Succu.
Is all so so simple.![]()
Just read this link below.![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sources_fo...an_sources
How utterly predictable. From your link:
Quote:The only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
2) Amy-Jill Levine: Theologian.
3) James Dunn: Theologian
4) William, R. Herzog: Theologian.
5) John Dominic Crossan: Theologian.
6) Craig Alan Evans: Theologian.
7) Christopher M. Tuckett: Anglican priest.
8) Bart D Ehrman: The darling of apologists everywhere because they think he supports their case.
9) Bruce Chilton: Theologian.
But that link is totally unrelated to what I asked you. Now go and find me a few bible scholars who are not Christian apologists.
That is quite dishonest on your part Succu.
First you claim and boost that only religious people pretend that Jesus story is valid for historicity purposes.
When I did show you that you are dead wrong with my link now you jump on one more story that I suppose to contradict if I can.
Why don't you stop with this farce and apologize for being dead wrong?
