Did you read your own paper, dickwad?
Try to get it through your thick fucking head that we have no evidence that jesusism even existed in fucking Rome in the mid first century.... let alone fucking India.
https://www.quora.com/Did-St-Thomas-real...e-to-India
Fuck you.
Your next problem is to demonstrate that there was a "St Thomas" at all. As there is no evidence for fucking jesus it naturally means that he didn't need any Merry Men, either.
Quote:Authority for the St. Thomas tradition of Kerala Christianity, i.e. its historicity, is a
matter of dispute among the historians, to a great extent, for want of sufficient, direct
archaeological evidences or backing of contemporary written documents. There are a good
number of Historians and writers, from all over the world, are questioning the Indian
apostolate of St.Thomas and the validity of the arguments of its proponents. There is no
contemporary evidence showing that Thomas had been in the subcontinent,
Try to get it through your thick fucking head that we have no evidence that jesusism even existed in fucking Rome in the mid first century.... let alone fucking India.
https://www.quora.com/Did-St-Thomas-real...e-to-India
Quote:As I have listed above, all the three main claims made by Christians in Kerala about the presence of St.Thomas here between C.E 52–72 are contradicted by historical facts . So either , he has never come here and even if he has , he could not have done what current Christians believe he has done. My personal opinion is that based on historical evidence, the chances that St.Thomas would have visited Kerala in C.E 52 is almost nil.
Fuck you.
Your next problem is to demonstrate that there was a "St Thomas" at all. As there is no evidence for fucking jesus it naturally means that he didn't need any Merry Men, either.