(September 26, 2017 at 9:55 am)A Theist Wrote:(September 26, 2017 at 9:37 am)Lutrinae Wrote: No is stating you are not entitled to your first amendment right, but neither does anyone have to agree with the shit that results from your right to free speech.We have an understanding, then. We have the equal right to disagree with each other. You have the right to voice your criticism of this country and I have the right to voice my support for it.
Nobody is trying to deny you rights fuckface.
We are saying that you are ignoring a very real problem America has and unfortunately has not widely enough faced.
Your bullshit oversimplification of "blacks are millionaires so there are no problems for other blacks whom arn't".
THAT is what we object to.
Those players are not doing that because they are spoiled. They are not doing it for the money. They have every right to be millionaires just like any white NFL player. What they want attention for is the fact that the non rich blacks, the communities they rose out of, still have economic problems, still have to fear a bad end to a police encounter.
If you insist that rich are crybabies, you should call the Kochs crybabies, the Walmart family crybabies, the Exxon CEO a crybaby. If you insist on calling a rich person a crybaby, your real worry is that the 1% isn't just screwing over urban blacks, but rural whites and the middle class too.
And you have no argument using the word "millionaire" when other white millionaire players agree with them, and no right to bitch when even the WHITE BILLIONAIRE owners are in solidarity with the black players.
So stop blowing smoke up my ass and making this about millionaires. This is about you ignoring that between blacks and whites, whom are not rich, like Brady is, or Cam Newton, this is about the players pointing out that between poor whites and poor blacks, blacks are still impacted more negatively by economics and our justice system.