Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 25, 2025, 4:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The universe is just one enormous 'Soul Filtering machine'
#53
RE: The universe is just one enormous 'Soul Filtering machine'
(September 28, 2017 at 8:28 am)SteveII Wrote:
(September 28, 2017 at 8:18 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: Why is that?  We've been given no real reason to accept the bible as fact, so we're not rejecting anything.  And if the acceptance and rejection are both infinite, what does that say about your god?

I posted this before:

People come to the place where they are willing to believe in God/supernatural for all kinds of reasons. Most are wired with something. Some are raised that way, some have events happen in their life (bad and good things), some encounter people who's testimony is compelling, and some read and find the person/message of Christ compelling (or a combination of any of these or something else I haven't thought of).

Why is it not pure faith? Well there are good rational reasons to believe. As we have been discussing, the NT events certainly compelled the witnesses of those events to believe (miracles and such) and continue to be compelling to those that accept the evidence for them as true. Another category of rational reasons are the Natural Theology Arguments.

a. God is the best explanation why anything at all exists.
b. God is the best explanation of the origin of the universe.
c. God is the best explanation of the fine-tuning of the universe for intelligent life.
d. God is the best explanation of intentional states of consciousness.
e. God is the best explanation of objective moral values and duties.

(December 30, 2016 at 12:03 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: I'm frequently confronted by theists who declare that God is the best explanation for some phenomena. I end up having to explain to them that while God is an explanation or hypothesis for that phenomena, by the standards we judge hypotheses / explanations, it is not a particularly good one. The Goddidit explanation has great scope, meaning the number of facts it can accommodate is broad -- he's omnipotent so that makes sense -- but it doesn't fare as well on other traits which we look for in a good explanation or hypothesis. The following is a list of them, for comparison purposes. (i.e. I finally found a good list of them.)

Quote:Philosophers of science have proposed a number of comparative approaches [to evaluating hypotheses], usually involving some combination of the following criteria:

Likelihood. The probability of the evidence occurring given the hypothesis in question.
Prior probability or plausibility. Our degree of belief in the hypothesis prior to observing the evidence, or assuming we had not observed it.
Predictive power. The degree to which the hypothesis determines which potential observations are possible (or probable) and which are impossible (or improbable).
Falsifiability. The degree to which the hypothesis "risks" being falsified by new evidence.
Parsimony. The degree to which the hypothesis observes the principle of Occam's razor: "Do not multiply entities needlessly."11

Other criteria often cited include explanatory power, track record, scope, coherence and elegance.

http://www.talkorigins.org/design/faqs/nfl/

What you assert as being the "best" explanation has few of the hallmarks that make even a good explanation. In terms of the quality of these explanations, they are basically on a par with the explanations of "it just happened" or "it just is." There are no properties of your god which are constrained by anything but the human imagination. In order for any of your natural theology arguments to be remotely compelling, you'd need to show that your hypothetical god exists anywhere but in the imagination of its proponents. This you cannot do, which is why you resort to characterizing your imaginary but poor solutions to these questions as "the best explanation." It's nothing but spin. Mere propaganda. Your explanations suck as explanations and there is no rationally compelling reason to accept them, any more than it makes rational sense to accept, "it just happened" as an explanation..
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The universe is just one enormous 'Soul Filtering machine' - by Angrboda - September 28, 2017 at 4:47 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Age of the Universe/Earth Ferrocyanide 31 5919 January 8, 2020 at 10:06 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  No-one under 25 in iceland believes god created the universe downbeatplumb 8 2560 August 19, 2018 at 7:55 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  I lost my Soul GoneGuy 212 46768 August 5, 2017 at 4:18 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer. SavedByGraceThruFaith 2761 945904 September 6, 2015 at 4:31 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  What does the (hypothetical) soul take with it? emjay 37 10898 April 14, 2015 at 11:23 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  In Christianity, Does Jesus' Soul Have Anything To Do With Why Jesus Is God? JesusIsGod7 18 8514 October 7, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist
  In order for Jesus to change your soul first he has to break your spirit. Zidneya 6 2794 August 1, 2014 at 2:18 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  The Accidental Time Machine (SPOILER THREAD) atheist04330 10 3388 July 21, 2014 at 6:26 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old Justtristo 402 252839 March 4, 2014 at 4:23 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  How do you get from "beginning of the universe" to christianity? Chad32 56 19907 January 19, 2014 at 6:18 pm
Last Post: Lek



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)