Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite

[I_am_not_mafia]

Sure, but first you need to define exactly what supernatural means and that it actually exists.

That has to come first otherwise any evidence is meaningless if you aren't even sure what it refers to.

But you won't be able to.

Here we are once again with shifting the burden of prove on me.

You are the one claiming that the supernatural exists. Therefore the burden is on you. Define what you mean by supernatural and then show us that it exists.

You can't so you're trying to shift the burden onto us.

I don't even know what supernatural could even be as to me it's a meaningless term that you are using (not me), so it's damn cheeky to use a nonsense term and then demand that others have to show evidence that it doesn't exist.

It's like me charging you with the crime of yghurtgyism but not telling you what it means and demanding that you prove that you are innocent,

If you guys don't know what the supernatural is why on hell you say or back up the one who say that the supernatural is bullshit?

Because the word is bullshit and can't be defined as far as I can tell, at least no one has ever giving it a good definition yet. Feel free to try and define it though. After all, you're the one using it.