(September 29, 2017 at 9:04 am)Mathilda Wrote:(September 29, 2017 at 8:55 am)Little Rik Wrote: Here we are once again with shifting the burden of prove on me.
You are the one claiming that the supernatural exists. Therefore the burden is on you. Define what you mean by supernatural and then show us that it exists.
You can't so you're trying to shift the burden onto us.
I don't even know what supernatural could even be as to me it's a meaningless term that you are using (not me), so it's damn cheeky to use a nonsense term and then demand that others have to show evidence that it doesn't exist.
It's like me charging you with the crime of yghurtgyism but not telling you what it means and demanding that you prove that you are innocent,
(September 29, 2017 at 8:55 am)Little Rik Wrote: If you guys don't know what the supernatural is why on hell you say or back up the one who say that the supernatural is bullshit?
Because the word is bullshit and can't be defined as far as I can tell, at least no one has ever giving it a good definition yet. Feel free to try and define it though. After all, you're the one using it.
I did asked you a simple question Mat.
I did asked you WHY YOU GUYS SAY OR BACK THE ONE WHO SAY THAT THE SUPERNATURAL DOES NOT EXIST
OR THAT IT IS BULLSHIT?
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT IS BS OR THAT IS DOESN'T EXIST?
The burden of prove is with you Mat not with me.
Why should I define what it is considering that you guys make the claim.
If you make a claim you suppose to know what it is all about.
Why you ask me to define?
Don't forget that you make the claim not me.