(September 29, 2017 at 10:16 am)Lutrinae Wrote:(September 29, 2017 at 10:12 am)Little Rik Wrote: The rule is that the burden of prove is with the one who make the claim.
Incorrect in the instance of this thread and this conversation.
When someone makes the claim that Santa Clause (god) does not exist, there is no logic in then stating, "The burden of proof is on you to prove that Santa Clause (god) does not exist." It is already understood that there is no evidence for Santa Clause (god), and anyone making the claim that Santa Clause (god) is real has the burden of proof to provide evidence of Santa Clause's (god's) existence.
If you can not give evidence that you are in love (physical or mental) how on hell you expect that someone can give you evidence of a spiritual love that is a lot higher than physical love?
It is only when someone experience that love that the evidence can be given.
By saying that there is no evidence that God exist you automatically play the dumb idiot considering that you never engage in the system that give access to that spiritual love and God evidence.
Dumb like a little boy that doesn't yet understand why two adult people kiss each other and think that they are stupid.
