(September 29, 2017 at 8:12 am)SteveII Wrote: You state: "In order for any of your natural theology arguments to be remotely compelling, you'd need to show that your hypothetical god exists anywhere but in the imagination of its proponents. This you cannot do..." You completely ignored the first two paragraphs of my post. These factors, while not convincing to you, are clearly convincing to others. Problem solved: Natural Theology arguments support the cumulative case.
So, as long as somebody is convinced, it validates the argument?!
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
