(September 29, 2017 at 11:50 am)Crossless2.0 Wrote:(September 29, 2017 at 11:29 am)SteveII Wrote: The arguments are successful pieces of reasoning. Jorm's comment was that we need additional reasons because inferring God into existence is not compelling.
The arguments are successful pieces of reasoning if the assumptions that underlie them are valid. I don't recall you or anyone else demonstrating they are.
Garbage in, garbage out.
Yep, soundness and validity baby.
Steve should ask what goes to those that shows why atheists aren't convinced.