The idea of having to be convinced via mind control, that made no sense. Evidence is sufficient to convince under most circumstances, so even if the evidence was a miracle, there's no need to go to such lengths to reach a conclusion of which you're convinced, even if there's no way to know for sure. Going that extra bizarre step was just excessive and seemed to indicate there was a necessity for absolute certainty. Maybe I got the wrong idea but that's how it came across.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
