Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite

[I_am_not_mafia]

Even the 24 hour fruit fly who proved inter species evolution which I am using to claim my theory about the strong survive during periods of climate change) is limited to very minor changes over literal hundreds of thousands of generations.

The reason I mention the 24 hour fruit fly is because we can observe hundreds generational changes in a matter of months., but again these fruit flies even have 100's of billions of observed genetic/inter species generational changes they have NEVER MORPHED into another species. Thus there has NEVER Been An observed example of species evolving or morphing into another. Your attempt to try and push inner species evolution as species evolution is an intellectually dishonest attempt of confusing the topic. or you simply do not understand the macro changes of evolution Darwin purposes against your own dealing with micro changes in a given species.

Here is a question that no creationist that I have asked has been able to answer and allows me to disregard your entire point about the 24 hour fruit fly.

What mechanism is in place to stop small changes from accumulating over many generations?

Now to explain about the 24 hour fruit fly. You are making assumptions about how quickly evolution works. What you are also ignoring and probably don't remember or know because you do not understand the theory of evolution, is that there needs to be evolutionary pressure for a species to adapt. There may have been hundreds of thousands of generations and plenty of mutations, but there has no been evolutionary pressure in your example for the fruit fly to change in any significant way so the mutations do not propagate throughout the population.

Yet the Peppered moth is an example of rapid change taking place because of a strong environmental pressure.

Another example, African elephants are being born without tusks due to poaching, researchers say

You are also deliberately ignoring the point I made before, that the fossil records show evolutionary change happening over a much longer time span. So of course persistent large scale changes have not been made in the short time span that you are referring to. The evidence in the fossil records shows though that evolution does happen over longer time scales. It is also inconsistent with your hypothesis.

Again it's a strawman argument from you because scientists aren't claiming that such large changes happen in such short time scales.

---

The theory of evolution does not specify that life can only have started in one place in the universe. Panspermia is compatible with the theory of evolution for example. Personally I think that life is abundant throughout the galaxy.

P.S You talk about your theory but it isn't a theory, it's a hypothesis. If it was backed up by a body of evidence then it would become a theory. But it isn't.

It is backed up by the same body of evidence. it's just I have taken time to connect the dots for everyone.

And evolution does. it start with amenoacids, how much more basic can life get?

I believe life is far more diverse and does not have to have it's genesis here.

Wrong. The theory of evolution does not specify that life can only have started in one place in the universe.

Amino acids have been found in meteorites so life could well have formed elsewhere as well as on Earth.