RE: Two scenarios that may/may not happen.
October 13, 2017 at 12:23 am
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2017 at 12:27 am by RayOfLight.)
(October 13, 2017 at 12:14 am)Khemikal Wrote: Until you can identify a single one of those facts.....Ray, it looks like a pretext to fling shit.
Identify what? That some historians do use the Gospels as historical documents?
PS: I don't use Google search to search for reliable sources, sorry, I don't have time to waste on some guy with a blog or some writer that likes to get a few bucks by writing a book with a shocking title. As a university student, I have access to academic search engines (professors don't accept google search materials in essays) that include peer-reviewed articles, so I don't know how you can access that.
(October 13, 2017 at 12:20 am)Minimalist Wrote: Moron jesus freaks think they are historical. I suppose you think it is a historical fact that your godboy flew up to fucking heaven, right?
We do not know who wrote them. We don't know when they were written. We don't know what, if any, source material was used for the original story (Gmark) although we can see that the later stories were largely copied from that one.
That is not history son. That is religious bullshit.
How am I supposed to discuss anything with you? You clearly are dogmatic just like a fundamentalist Christian, dear lord!
